ADR — Average Daily Rate
The average revenue a hotel earns from each occupied room in a single day, net of discounts and promotions. Calculated as total room revenue divided by rooms sold.
A practical reference for the terms used by hospitality analysts and reputation managers — from financial KPIs (RevPAR, ADR) to satisfaction signals (NPS, GuestScore) to analytical methodologies (Root Cause, Sentiment Analysis).
The average revenue a hotel earns from each occupied room in a single day, net of discounts and promotions. Calculated as total room revenue divided by rooms sold.
The most important performance indicator in hospitality. Blends occupancy and ADR into one number. Calculated as ADR × occupancy rate, or total room revenue ÷ rooms available.
Profit from operations, stripped of financing and ownership structure effects. Measures operational management efficiency fairly, independent of the owner's financing decisions.
Based on a single question: "How likely are you to recommend this hotel to a friend?" (0–10). Detractors (0–6) are subtracted from Promoters (9–10). Result ranges from -100 to +100.
The average guest rating across review platforms (Booking.com, Google, TripAdvisor, Agoda). The most commonly benchmarked number because it's public and verified.
A platform that sells hotel bookings electronically on commission. Major ones: Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, Almosafer. Typically take 15–25% of the booking value.
A measure of reputation “liveliness”. A hotel with a 4.5 average and ten fresh reviews a month reads to a searcher as an active place, unlike one with 4.7 and no review in a year. Booking.com states that the more recent the review, the bigger its impact on the total score.
Classifying the tone of each review (or each sentence inside it) as positive, neutral, or negative. Some commercial platforms produce it automatically with topic tagging, at accuracy that varies with dialect and sarcasm.
Rather than treating symptoms, RCA searches for the real cause. Example: repeated "room was dirty" complaints may be rooted in an unrealistic housekeeping schedule, not a careless employee.
Measures how seriously a hotel engages with its guests. It is visible to the guest on the property page whenever management replies.
Wider than "responding to reviews". Covers: multi-platform monitoring, trend analysis, operational coordination to fix root causes, and inviting every guest to review, neutrally, with no selection and no incentive.
For hotels tied to a global brand (Marriott, IHG, Accor…), a periodic audit compares actual performance to the brand's standards manual. Results may affect the franchise license.
A copied management reply that could be pasted under any review at any hotel without changing a word. Its opposite is the specific reply that names the issue and what was done about it. In case study 02, only 10 of 246 replies were written for a specific guest — 4.1%.
In the methodology used here, every classified issue is routed to the department that owns it and given a severity level. A high risk is one that recurs and affects safety, revenue, or the classification category. Case study 02 produced 23 high, 26 medium and 108 low operational risks.
An average hides the shape. Two hotels averaging 3.8 can be very different: one steady at 4, the other split between 5 and 1. The distribution shows which, and identifies the least-satisfied segment an improvement plan should target.
A shape with two peaks: a mass at 5 stars and a mass at 1, with a hollow middle. It usually means an inconsistent experience — one guest gets exactly what was promised and the next hits the same fault — rather than a uniformly mediocre one.
We turn your guest reviews into a decision-grade report — with an engineering methodology linking every complaint to a root cause, and a prioritized improvement plan.
Request your analysisTo apply these terms to a platform score in practice, see how to improve your Booking.com score.